On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 16:04 -0700, Cong Wang wrote: > Andrey reported this kernel warning:
> Unlike commit 26cabd31259ba43f68026ce3f62b78094124333f > ("sched, net: Clean up sk_wait_event() vs. might_sleep()"), the > sleeping function is called before schedule_timeout(), this is indeed > a bug. Fix this by moving the wait logic to the new API, it is similar > to commit ff960a731788a7408b6f66ec4fd772ff18833211 > ("netdev, sched/wait: Fix sleeping inside wait event"). > > Reported-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyk...@google.com> > Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyk...@google.com> > Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> > --- Excellent. I guess we could also define sk_wait_event_woken() and use it instead of sk_wait_event(), and also in inet_wait_for_connect() +#define sk_wait_event_woken(__sk, __timeo, __condition, __wait) \ + ({ int __rc; \ + release_sock(__sk); \ + __rc = __condition; \ + if (!__rc) { \ + *(__timeo) = wait_woken(__wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, \ + *(__timeo)); \ + } \ + lock_sock(__sk); \ + __rc = __condition; \ + __rc; \ + }) sk_wait_data() would need : @@ -2078,14 +2080,14 @@ void __sk_flush_backlog(struct sock *sk) */ int sk_wait_data(struct sock *sk, long *timeo, const struct sk_buff *skb) { + DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function); int rc; - DEFINE_WAIT(wait); - prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); + add_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait); sk_set_bit(SOCKWQ_ASYNC_WAITDATA, sk); - rc = sk_wait_event(sk, timeo, skb_peek_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue) != skb); + rc = sk_wait_event_woken(sk, timeo, skb_peek_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue) != skb, &wait); sk_clear_bit(SOCKWQ_ASYNC_WAITDATA, sk); - finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait); + remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait); return rc; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(sk_wait_data);