> -----Original Message----- > From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:a...@arndb.de] > Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 6:48 PM > To: linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org > Cc: Y.B. Lu; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; ulf.hans...@linaro.org; Scott > Wood; Mark Rutland; Greg Kroah-Hartman; X.B. Xie; M.H. Lian; linux- > i...@vger.kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Qiang Zhao; Russell King; > Bhupesh Sharma; Joerg Roedel; Claudiu Manoil; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; > Rob Herring; Santosh Shilimkar; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; > netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Leo Li; > io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; Kumar Gala; Geert Uytterhoeven > Subject: Re: [v15, 6/7] base: soc: introduce soc_device_match() interface > > On Friday, October 28, 2016 2:50:17 PM CEST Yangbo Lu wrote: > > + > > +static int soc_device_match_one(struct device *dev, void *arg) { > > + struct soc_device *soc_dev = container_of(dev, struct > soc_device, dev); > > + const struct soc_device_attribute *match = arg; > > + > > + if (match->machine && > > + !glob_match(match->machine, soc_dev->attr->machine)) > > + return 0; > > + > > + if (match->family && > > + !glob_match(match->family, soc_dev->attr->family)) > > + return 0; > > + > > > > Geert found a bug in my code, and submitted a fix at > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9361395/ > > I think you should include that one in your series. >
[Lu Yangbo-B47093] Ok, no problem. Thanks :) > Arnd
