On 10/21/2016 12:47 AM, Cong Wang wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Since you want to test SELinux anyway, please test the attached one. >> > > Finally my kernel config is friendly to SELinux, and now there are several > tests fails: > > > Test Summary Report > ------------------- > sysctl/test (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 2) > Failed tests: 1-2 > mmap/test (Wstat: 0 Tests: 44 Failed: 2) > Failed tests: 20, 26 > overlay/test (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) > Non-zero exit status: 255 > Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 121 tests but ran 0. > Files=44, Tests=306, 47 wallclock secs ( 0.23 usr 0.30 sys + 1.00 > cusr 7.35 csys = 8.88 CPU) > Result: FAIL > > Seems not related to my patch?
Probably kernel config related. All tests pass for me on rawhide. Kernel config? > And, there is a kernel warning which is totally unrelated to my code: > > > [ 136.788836] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 136.793046] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1345 at fs/locks.c:615 > locks_unlink_lock_ctx+0xc7/0xcc > [ 136.799829] CPU: 1 PID: 1345 Comm: test_lease Not tainted 4.8.0+ #271 > [ 136.803814] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 > [ 136.803814] ffffc900036bfd38 ffffffff8152c08e 0000000000000000 > 0000000000000000 > [ 136.803814] ffffc900036bfd78 ffffffff810841c0 00000267036bfc88 > ffff8800db2371e8 > [ 136.803814] ffff8800db26f4c0 ffffc900036bfe00 ffffc900036bfe00 > ffff8800db239240 > [ 136.803814] Call Trace: > [ 136.803814] [<ffffffff8152c08e>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 > [ 136.803814] [<ffffffff810841c0>] __warn+0xbd/0xd8 > [ 136.803814] [<ffffffff81084297>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f > [ 136.803814] [<ffffffff8121b9cb>] locks_unlink_lock_ctx+0xc7/0xcc > [ 136.803814] [<ffffffff8121bd9e>] locks_delete_lock_ctx+0x17/0x3a > [ 136.803814] [<ffffffff8121be71>] lease_modify+0xb0/0xb9 > [ 136.803814] [<ffffffff8121e868>] locks_remove_file+0x93/0xbd > [ 136.803814] [<ffffffff811d903d>] __fput+0xd0/0x19b > [ 136.803814] [<ffffffff811d913e>] ____fput+0xe/0x10 > [ 136.803814] [<ffffffff8109ff86>] task_work_run+0x6c/0x97 > [ 136.803814] [<ffffffff8100188a>] prepare_exit_to_usermode+0xb0/0xcc > [ 136.803814] [<ffffffff81001a04>] syscall_return_slowpath+0x15e/0x1c2 > [ 136.803814] [<ffffffff81001ad7>] do_syscall_64+0x6f/0x76 > [ 136.803814] [<ffffffff81b22424>] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25 > [ 138.538370] ---[ end trace 90914a16bd3272b8 ]--- Don't see this on current kernels (e.g. 4.9-rc1).
