On 10/20/2016 08:41 PM, William Tu wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 06:04:38PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
index ee384f0..d4832e8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
@@ -25,6 +25,33 @@
static int map_flags;
+static unsigned int num_possible_cpus(void)
+{
+ static const char *fcpu = "/sys/devices/system/cpu/possible";
+ unsigned int val, possible_cpus = 0;
+ char buff[128];
+ FILE *fp;
+
+ fp = fopen(fcpu, "r");
+ if (!fp) {
+ printf("Failed to open %s: '%s'!\n", fcpu, strerror(errno));
+ exit(1);
+ }
+
+ while (fgets(buff, sizeof(buff), fp)) {
+ if (sscanf(buff, "%*u-%u", &val) == 1)
+ possible_cpus = val;
+ }
looks great to me.
Could you move it into bpf_sys.h or somehow make it common in libbpf
and reuse it in samples/bpf/ ?
Since quite a few samples need this fix as well.
Ahh, true.
Thanks!
Looks good to me. I tested it and it works fine.
Okay, thanks. I'll fix that up, mid-term we should try and move most of
that over to kernel selftests/bpf, and reuse tools/lib/bpf/.
Thanks!
William