On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 09:41 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > I assume the stack buffer itself is not the problem here, but aad, > > which is allocated on the stack one frame up. > > Do we really need to revert the whole patch to fix that? > > Ah never mind, this is about 'odata'. Apologies, should have read > first
Right, odata also goes into an sg list and further on. I think we should wait for Herbert to chime in before we do any further work though, perhaps he has any better ideas. johannes
