On Saturday 01 October 2016, David Howells wrote: > commit 35510eefc29e2757c1ac46218cded2e505093fc2 > Author: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com> > Date: Sat Oct 1 00:35:15 2016 +0100 > > rxrpc: Split rxrpc_send_call_packet() > > Split rxrpc_send_data_packet() to separate ACK generation (which is more > complicated) from ABORT generation. This simplifies the code a bit and > avoids the following warning: > > In file included from ../net/rxrpc/output.c:20:0: > net/rxrpc/output.c: In function 'rxrpc_send_call_packet': > net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h:1187:27: error: 'top' may be used uninitialized > in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] > net/rxrpc/output.c:103:24: note: 'top' was declared here > net/rxrpc/output.c:225:25: error: 'hard_ack' may be used uninitialized in > this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] > > Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> > Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com>
Yes, good idea. We could probably share the part of the two functions that sets the contents of the msg and pkt variables by moving it into a third function, but I'm not sure if that actually improves readability or just reduces the number of lines. Arnd