From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torok...@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:46:05 -0700
> Hi David, > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Dmitry Torokhov > <dmitry.torok...@gmail.com> wrote: >> If net namespace is attached to a user namespace let's make container's >> root owner of sysctls affecting said network namespace instead of global >> root. >> >> This also allows us to clean up net_ctl_permissions() because we do not >> need to fudge permissions anymore for the container's owner since it now >> owns the objects in question. >> >> Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebied...@xmission.com> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torok...@gmail.com> > > I was looking at linux-next today, and I noticed that, when you merged > my patch, you basically reverted the following commit: > > commit d6e0d306449bcb5fa3c80e7a3edf11d45abf9ae9 > Author: Tyler Hicks <tyhi...@canonical.com> > Date: Thu Jun 2 23:43:22 2016 -0500 > > net: Use ns_capable_noaudit() when determining net sysctl permissions Please send me a fixup patch for this, sorry.
