On 29/09/16 03:36, R. Parameswaran wrote: > I agree that something like 2. below would be needed in the long run (it > will need some effort and redesign -e.g. how do I lookup the parent tunnel > from the socket when receiving a PMTU update, existing pointer chain runs > from tunnel to socket). >> 2) Add code to handle PMTU events that land on the UDP tunnel >> socket.
Another function pointer could be added to struct udp_sock, similar to encap_rcv, such that the pmtu event could be handled by the UDP encap protocol implementation. James
