From: Eric Dumazet
> Sent: 23 September 2016 15:37
> On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 11:09 -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 06:42:51AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 09:45 -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > >
> > > > Aye. In that case, what about using tail instead of end?
> > >
> > >
> > > What do you mean exactly ?
> >
> > Something like:
> > -skb->truesize = SKB_TRUESIZE(skb_end_offset(skb));
> > +skb->truesize = SKB_TRUESIZE(skb_tail_offset(skb));
>
> Certainly not ;)
>
> This would be lying.
> We really want a precise memory accounting to avoid OOM.
>
> Some USB drivers use 8KB for their skb->head, you do not want to pretend
> its 66+NET_SKB_PAF=F bytes just because there is no payload in the
> packet.
Last I look some of the USBnet drivers used 64k+ skb (and then
lied about truesize).
That whole usbnet stuff needs a rework for usb3 (xhci) so that once
the rings (etc) are all setup packet transfer looks much more like
a normal ethernet device.
I think it needs to stop trying to receive into skb, instead just
receive into usb sized buffers - and then generate skb that contain
the ethernet frame data.
Not that I'm volunteering :-)
David
