On 05.09.2016 10:06, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> In general, when DAD detected IPv6 duplicate address, ifp->state
> will be set to INET6_IFADDR_STATE_ERRDAD and DAD is stopped by a
> delayed work, the call tree should be like this:
>
> ndisc_recv_ns
> -> addrconf_dad_failure <- missing ifp put
> -> addrconf_mod_dad_work
> -> schedule addrconf_dad_work()
> -> addrconf_dad_stop() <- missing ifp hold before call it
>
> addrconf_dad_failure() called with ifp refcont holding but not put.
> addrconf_dad_work() call addrconf_dad_stop() without extra holding
> refcount. This will not cause any issue normally.
>
> But the race between addrconf_dad_failure() and addrconf_dad_work()
> may cause ifp refcount leak and netdevice can not be unregister,
> dmesg show the following messages:
>
> IPv6: eth0: IPv6 duplicate address fe80::XX:XXXX:XXXX:XX detected!
> ...
> unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth0 to become free. Usage count = 1
>
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: c15b1ccadb32 ("ipv6: move DAD and addrconf_verify processing
> to workqueue")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongj...@huawei.com>
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> index bdf368e..2f1f5d4 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> @@ -1948,6 +1948,7 @@ errdad:
> spin_unlock_bh(&ifp->lock);
>
> addrconf_mod_dad_work(ifp, 0);
> + in6_ifa_put(ifp);
> }
This in6_ifa_put makes sense.
>
> /* Join to solicited addr multicast group.
> @@ -3857,6 +3858,7 @@ static void addrconf_dad_work(struct work_struct *w)
> addrconf_dad_begin(ifp);
> goto out;
> } else if (action == DAD_ABORT) {
> + in6_ifa_hold(ifp);
> addrconf_dad_stop(ifp, 1);
> if (disable_ipv6)
> addrconf_ifdown(idev->dev, 0);
>
But why you add a in6_ifa_hold here isn't clear to me. Could you explain
why this is necessary? I don't see any async stuff being done in
addrconf_dad_stop, thus the reference we already have should be
sufficient for the lifetime of addrconf_dad_stop.
Thanks,
Hannes
