Hi,
On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 23:52:29 +0800 Eli Cooper <elicoo...@gmx.com> wrote:
> Commit 8eb30be0352d0916 ("ipv6: Create ip6_tnl_xmit") unsets
> flowi6_proto in ip4ip6_tnl_xmit() and ip6ip6_tnl_xmit().
> Since xfrm_selector_match() relies on this info, IPv6 packets
> sent by an ip6tunnel cannot be properly selected by their
> protocols after removing it. This patch puts flowi6_proto back.
>
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 8eb30be0352d ("ipv6: Create ip6_tnl_xmit")
> Signed-off-by: Eli Cooper <elicoo...@gmx.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c
> index 2050217..5c57797 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c
> @@ -1174,6 +1174,7 @@ ip4ip6_tnl_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device
> *dev)
> encap_limit = t->parms.encap_limit;
>
> memcpy(&fl6, &t->fl.u.ip6, sizeof(fl6));
> + fl6.flowi6_proto = IPPROTO_IPIP;
>
> dsfield = ipv4_get_dsfield(iph);
>
> @@ -1233,6 +1234,7 @@ ip6ip6_tnl_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device
> *dev)
> encap_limit = t->parms.encap_limit;
>
> memcpy(&fl6, &t->fl.u.ip6, sizeof(fl6));
> + fl6.flowi6_proto = IPPROTO_IPV6;
>
I wonder if this is the right way to go.
This DOES fix the regression for ip4ip6_tnl_xmit and ip6ip6_tnl_xmit
users.
However new users of 'ip6_tnl_xmit' (e.g. __gre6_xmit callers) may still
have their 'fl6->flowi6_proto' not armed.
Maybe the right fix is assigning 'fl6->flowi6_proto = proto', either at
start of 'ip6_tnl_xmit' or just prior the ip6_route_output() call.
Tom, can you acknowledge?
Thanks,
Shmulik
