Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here at Google we have been using usec resolution in TCP timestamps for > a while for all our DC traffic, and we have to upstream this at some > point. > > It would be nice if the randomization was optional, because having usec > timestamps with a common base (ie no per flow random base) helps a lot > to understand the host delays at transmit time, and receive time.
Would it help to make it per-host instead of per-flow? > I will review your patch more in depth today, thanks. Great, thanks a lot!
