Steffen Klassert <steffen.klass...@secunet.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:17:59PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > @@ -972,14 +972,14 @@ int xfrm_policy_flush(struct net *net, u8 type, bool 
> > task_valid)
> >                     if (pol->type != type)
> >                             continue;
> >                     __xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
> > -                   write_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
> > +                   spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
> >                     cnt++;
> >  
> >                     xfrm_audit_policy_delete(pol, 1, task_valid);
> >  
> >                     xfrm_policy_kill(pol);
> >  
> > -                   write_lock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
> > +                   spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
> 
> I've just noticed that you accidentally replaced write_lock_bh
> with spin_unlock_bh here.

Sorry about this, thanks for fixing this up.

Reply via email to