On 08/10/2016 01:59 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 06:14:42PM +0200, ggar...@abra.uab.cat wrote:
+static struct sk_buff *
+virtio_vsock_pkt_vsockmon_to_vsockmon_skb(struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt)
+{
+ struct sk_buff *skb;
+ struct af_vsockmon_hdr *hdr;
+ void *payload;
+
+ u32 skb_len = sizeof(struct af_vsockmon_hdr) + pkt->len;
+
+ skb = alloc_skb(skb_len, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (!skb)
+ return NULL;
+
+ hdr = (struct af_vsockmon_hdr *) skb_put(skb, sizeof(*hdr));
+
+ hdr->src_cid = pkt->hdr.src_cid;
+ hdr->src_port = pkt->hdr.src_port;
+ hdr->dst_cid = pkt->hdr.dst_cid;
+ hdr->dst_port = pkt->hdr.dst_port;
+ hdr->t = cpu_to_le16(AF_VSOCK_T_VIRTIO);
+ hdr->len = cpu_to_le16(sizeof(hdr->t_hdr));
+
+ switch(pkt->hdr.op) {
Missing le16_to_cpu()
Right
+ case VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_REQUEST:
+ case VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RESPONSE:
+ hdr->op = cpu_to_le16(AF_VSOCK_OP_CONNECT);
+ break;
+ case VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RST:
+ case VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_SHUTDOWN:
+ hdr->op = cpu_to_le16(AF_VSOCK_OP_DISCONNECT);
+ break;
+ case VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW:
+ hdr->op = cpu_to_le16(AF_VSOCK_OP_PAYLOAD);
+ break;
+ case VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_CREDIT_UPDATE:
+ case VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_CREDIT_REQUEST:
+ hdr->op = cpu_to_le16(AF_VSOCK_OP_CONTROL);
+ break;
+ default:
+ hdr->op = cpu_to_le16(AF_VSOCK_OP_UNKNOWN);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ hdr->t_hdr.virtio_hdr = pkt->hdr;
+
+ if (pkt->len) {
+ payload = skb_put(skb, pkt->len);
+ memcpy(payload, pkt->buf, pkt->len);
+ }
+
+ return skb;
+}
+
+static void vsock_deliver_tap_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt)
+{
+ struct sk_buff *skb = virtio_vsock_pkt_to_vsockmon_skb(pkt);
+ if (skb) {
+ vsock_deliver_tap(skb);
+ kfree_skb(skb);
Should this be consume_skb()? The function's doc comment says:
* Functions identically to kfree_skb, but kfree_skb assumes that the frame
* is being dropped after a failure and notes that
This isn't a failure case so kfree_skb() is not the right function.
I agree, consume_skb is more appropriate.