Hi,

On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:32:23 +0300 Hadar Hen Zion <had...@mellanox.com> wrote:
> @@ -181,7 +188,9 @@ static int tcf_vlan_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
> tc_action *a,
>       if (v->tcfv_action == TCA_VLAN_ACT_PUSH &&
>           (nla_put_u16(skb, TCA_VLAN_PUSH_VLAN_ID, v->tcfv_push_vid) ||
>            nla_put_be16(skb, TCA_VLAN_PUSH_VLAN_PROTOCOL,
> -                       v->tcfv_push_proto)))
> +                       v->tcfv_push_proto) ||
> +          (v->tcfv_push_prio && nla_put_u8(skb, TCA_VLAN_PUSH_VLAN_PRIORITY,
> +                                           v->tcfv_push_prio))))
>               goto nla_put_failure;

nit: We could avoid the 'v->tcfv_push_prio' test, so user can explicitly
observe the associated priority, even if it is set to zero.

Reviewed-by: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladk...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to