From: Jiri Kosina <ji...@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 11:02:43 +0200 (CEST)

> Does that strictly have to be a show-stopper for the qdisc hash 
> conversion, given the fact that the whole tree is building properly?

I guess not.  Please submit that change as a series, first patches
that correct the build required hash symbol conflict fixes, then
the qdisc change itself.

THanks.

Reply via email to