On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 01:38:40PM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 02:57:26PM -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote: > > On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 12:20:54PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > > > > Sorry, I missunderstood your patch completely the first time around. > > > Yes I think this is an excellent idea. Assuming its tested and works > > > I'm happy to sign off on it and prod DaveM. > > > > Horms, > > > > I'll get a setup together and post results when I have them. > > I was thinking that it would be nice if the timeout could be sent over > the wire, though that might bring in some compatibility issues, > and thus your approach might be the best idea. > > -- > Horms > http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
Horms, At first I too thought about including the timeout in the messages would be nice, but it could raise compatibility issues with maybe the only advantage being that it would allow quicker timeout of connections -- something that might be undesirable in such an LVS environment. -andy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
