On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 06:17:39PM -0300, Marc Dionne wrote: > Hi Pablo, > > Testing out your patch: > > 1) With no NAT in place, the clash resolution happens, with no side > effects. No EPERM errors are seen. > > 2) With ip(6)table_nat loaded, the clash resolution fails and I get > some EPERM errors from sendmsg(), same as before 71d8c47fc653. > > Turns out that even though I have no NAT rules in my iptables config, > the system also had firewalld active and that caused the modules to be > loaded. > > So the bottom line is that the patch looks good to me..
Thanks Marc, I'm going to apply this then.
