From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn> Fixes the following sparse warnings:
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c:79:5: warning: symbol '_mtk_mdio_write' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c:98:5: warning: symbol '_mtk_mdio_read' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn> --- drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c index 682797e..6f597eb 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c @@ -76,8 +76,8 @@ static int mtk_mdio_busy_wait(struct mtk_eth *eth) return -1; } -u32 _mtk_mdio_write(struct mtk_eth *eth, u32 phy_addr, - u32 phy_register, u32 write_data) +static u32 _mtk_mdio_write(struct mtk_eth *eth, u32 phy_addr, + u32 phy_register, u32 write_data) { if (mtk_mdio_busy_wait(eth)) return -1; @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ u32 _mtk_mdio_write(struct mtk_eth *eth, u32 phy_addr, return 0; } -u32 _mtk_mdio_read(struct mtk_eth *eth, int phy_addr, int phy_reg) +static u32 _mtk_mdio_read(struct mtk_eth *eth, int phy_addr, int phy_reg) { u32 d;