Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:54:12PM CEST, rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
>On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:18:47 +0200
>Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
>> index c99ffe8..865ade6 100644
>> --- a/include/net/devlink.h
>> +++ b/include/net/devlink.h
>> @@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ struct devlink *devlink_alloc(const struct devlink_ops
>> *ops, size_t priv_size);
>> int devlink_register(struct devlink *devlink, struct device *dev);
>> void devlink_unregister(struct devlink *devlink);
>> void devlink_free(struct devlink *devlink);
>> +void devlink_trace_hwmsg(const struct devlink *devlink, bool incoming,
>> + unsigned long type, const u8 *buf, size_t len);
>> int devlink_port_register(struct devlink *devlink,
>> struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>> unsigned int port_index);
>> @@ -154,6 +156,12 @@ static inline void devlink_free(struct devlink *devlink)
>> kfree(devlink);
>> }
>>
>> +static inline void devlink_trace_hwmsg(const struct devlink *devlink,
>> + bool incoming, unsigned long type,
>> + const u8 *buf, size_t len);
>> +{
>> +}
>> +
>
>I'm assuming the !CONFIG_NET_DEVLINK was never tested, because the
>above probably wont build, and if it did, it would be wrong.
Will fix.
