On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 15:22:30 +0200 Florian Westphal <f...@strlen.de> wrote: > Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladk...@ravellosystems.com> wrote: > > I'd appreciate any suggestion how to determine traffic is local OTHER > > THAN testing IPSKB_FORWARDED; If we have such a way, there wouldn't be an > > impact on local traffic. > > > > > What about setting IPCB FORWARD flag in iptunnel_xmit if > > > skb->skb_iif != 0... instead?
I've came up with a suggestion that does not abuse IPSKB_FORWARDED, while properly addressing the use case (and similar ones), without introducing the cost of entering 'skb_gso_validate_mtu' in the local case. How about: @@ -220,12 +220,15 @@ static int ip_finish_output_gso(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int mtu) { netdev_features_t features; + int local_trusted_gso; struct sk_buff *segs; int ret = 0; - /* common case: locally created skb or seglen is <= mtu */ - if (((IPCB(skb)->flags & IPSKB_FORWARDED) == 0) || - skb_gso_validate_mtu(skb, mtu)) + local_trusted_gso = (IPCB(skb)->flags & IPSKB_FORWARDED) == 0 && + !(skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_DODGY); + /* common case: locally created skb from a trusted gso source or + * seglen is <= mtu */ + if (local_trusted_gso || skb_gso_validate_mtu(skb, mtu)) return ip_finish_output2(net, sk, skb); /* Slowpath - GSO segment length is exceeding the dst MTU. This well addresses the usecase where we have gso-skb arriving from an untrusted source, thus its gso_size is out of our control (e.g. tun/tap, macvtap, af_packet, xen-netfront...). Locally "gso trusted" skbs (the common case) will NOT suffer the additional (possibly costy) call to 'skb_gso_validate_mtu'. Also, if IPSKB_FORWARDED is true, behavior stays exactly the same. Regards, Shmulik