On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 15:22:30 +0200 Florian Westphal <f...@strlen.de> wrote:
> Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladk...@ravellosystems.com> wrote:
> > I'd appreciate any suggestion how to determine traffic is local OTHER
> > THAN testing IPSKB_FORWARDED; If we have such a way, there wouldn't be an
> > impact on local traffic.
> >   
> > > What about setting IPCB FORWARD flag in iptunnel_xmit if
> > > skb->skb_iif != 0... instead?  

I've came up with a suggestion that does not abuse IPSKB_FORWARDED,
while properly addressing the use case (and similar ones), without
introducing the cost of entering 'skb_gso_validate_mtu' in the local
case.

How about:

@@ -220,12 +220,15 @@ static int ip_finish_output_gso(struct net *net, struct 
sock *sk,
                                struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int mtu)
 {
        netdev_features_t features;
+       int local_trusted_gso;
        struct sk_buff *segs;
        int ret = 0;
 
-       /* common case: locally created skb or seglen is <= mtu */
-       if (((IPCB(skb)->flags & IPSKB_FORWARDED) == 0) ||
-             skb_gso_validate_mtu(skb, mtu))
+       local_trusted_gso = (IPCB(skb)->flags & IPSKB_FORWARDED) == 0 &&
+                           !(skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_DODGY);
+       /* common case: locally created skb from a trusted gso source or
+        * seglen is <= mtu */
+       if (local_trusted_gso || skb_gso_validate_mtu(skb, mtu))
                return ip_finish_output2(net, sk, skb);
 
        /* Slowpath -  GSO segment length is exceeding the dst MTU.

This well addresses the usecase where we have gso-skb arriving from an
untrusted source, thus its gso_size is out of our control (e.g. tun/tap,
macvtap, af_packet, xen-netfront...).

Locally "gso trusted" skbs (the common case) will NOT suffer the
additional (possibly costy) call to 'skb_gso_validate_mtu'.

Also, if IPSKB_FORWARDED is true, behavior stays exactly the same.

Regards,
Shmulik

Reply via email to