From: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 23:02:51 +0100
> Simplify the RxRPC connect() implementation. It will just note the > destination address it is given, and if a sendmsg() comes along with no > address, this will be assigned as the address. No transport struct will be > held internally, which will allow us to remove this later. > > Simplify sendmsg() also. Whilst a call is active, userspace refers to it > by a private unique user ID specified in a control message. When sendmsg() > sees a user ID that doesn't map to an extant call, it creates a new call > for that user ID and attempts to add it. If, when we try to add it, the > user ID is now registered, we now reject the message with -EEXIST. We > should never see this situation unless two threads are racing, trying to > create a call with the same ID - which would be an error. > > It also isn't required to provide sendmsg() with an address - provided the > control message data holds a user ID that maps to a currently active call. > > Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com> Applied to net-next, thanks.
