On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 02:36:18AM +0200, Nuri Jawad told us:
> Did you create a high load on the system in the manner I described?
> The bug once only appeared after about 6 hours here when line + CPU had 
> been mostly idle. But that was the longest time between failures. Can you 
> test with one of the 2.6.16 kernels I tried (latest was .9)? Can't say 

Unfortunately it seems like plain 2.6.16.x doesn't like the ide
controller on my (VIA) mainboard, I'm getting I/O errrors on hda
when booting this kernel (but hard drive works ok with -mm) :-(
actually I haven't been running a plain stable kernel for a while,
I've been running -mm kernels for ages...


Sven

> for sure if CPU load is a factor, load on the connection seems to be.

-- 
Linux zion.homelinux.com 2.6.17-rc1-mm1_31 #31 Sat Apr 8 16:18:23 CEST 2006 
i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
 23:16:15 up  3:58,  2 users,  load average: 0.83, 0.82, 0.79

Attachment: pgpuSq4dOMoY2.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to