On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 16:19 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Jeff Kirsher > <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 10:44 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > >> This patch series is meant to be applied after: > >> [PATCH v7 net-next 00/16] ipv6: Enable GUEoIPv6 and more fixes for v6 > >> tunneling > >> > >> The first patch addresses an issue we already resolved in the GREv4 > and > >> is > >> now present in GREv6 with the introduction of FOU/GUE for IPv6 based > GRE > >> tunnels. > >> > >> The second patch goes through and enables IPv6 tunnel offloads for the > >> Intel > >> NICs that already support the IPv4 based IP-in-IP tunnel offloads. I > >> have > >> only done a bit of touch testing but have seen ~20 Gb/s over an i40e > >> interface using a v4-in-v6 tunnel, and I have verified IPv6 GRE is > still > >> passing traffic at around the same rate. I plan to do further testing > >> but > >> with these patches present it should enable a wider audience to be > able > >> to > >> test the new features introduced in Tom's patchset with hardware > >> offloads. > >> > >> --- > >> > >> Alexander Duyck (2): > >> ip6_gre: Do not allow segmentation offloads GRE_CSUM is enabled > >> with FOU/GUE > >> intel: Add support for IPv6 IP-in-IP offload > > > > Dave, I have this series added to my queue. > > Jeff, > > If Tom's patches make it in for 4.7, then I would like to see if we > could push these patches for "net" since essentially the first patch > is a fix for Tom's earlier patches and the second is needed in order > to really be able to test Tom's patches with a driver that actually > supports a hardware offload.
Yeah, I was thinking that very same thing. I will wait to see if Dave sucks this into 4.7 or not and plan accordingly. I also figured out that your two patch series needs to have Tom's series applied before hand, so I will be adding Tom's series to my tree just for testing purposes.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
