Paul Menzel <paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net> : [...] > As over five years have passed now, do you think that is still needed? > I wonder why no module parameter was added back then, where users could > enable ASPM if it works on their systems? Because there is no such > situation and it always fails?
It was enabled again (d64ec841517a25f6d468bde9f67e5b4cffdc67c7) then disabled (4521e1a94279ce610d3f9b7945c17d581f804242). It's closer to 3.5 years :o) Module parameters are frowned upon. Lin, is there some interest in selectively [*] enabling (or disabling) ASPM support in the r8169 driver or will it be unreliable ? [*] Based on DMI information for instance. -- Ueimor
