>  {
>       struct mv88e6xxx_priv_state *ps = ds_to_priv(ds);
>       int addr = mv88e6xxx_port_to_phy_addr(ps, port);
> -     int ret;
> +     int err;
>  
>       if (addr < 0)
>               return 0xffff;
>  
> +

We don't want an extra blank line. I'm surprised checkpatch did not
warn about this.

>       mutex_lock(&ps->smi_mutex);
> -     ret = _mv88e6xxx_phy_write(ps, addr, regnum, val);
> +
> +     if (mv88e6xxx_has(ps, MV88E6XXX_FLAG_PPU))
> +             err = _mv88e6xxx_phy_write_ppu(ps, addr, regnum, val);
> +     else
> +             err = _mv88e6xxx_phy_write(ps, addr, regnum, val);
> +
>       mutex_unlock(&ps->smi_mutex);
> -     return ret;
> +
> +     return err;

Please don't rename ret to err. This patch is about phy reading and
writing, and i don't expect to see anything else here. It makes it
harder to review.

         Andrew

Reply via email to