Le 26/04/2016 20:27, Sergei Shtylyov a écrit : > On 04/26/2016 08:17 PM, David Miller wrote: > >>> I plan to queue this patch through arm-soc for 4.7. >> >> Ok. > > How about this patch going thru your net-next repo instead? > I'd like to keep the kernel bisectable... if my phylib/macb patches get > merged > earlier than this one, that board would be broken...
Sergei, David, I don't think that there is a big risk for this board to be tested in the meantime as it's not widely deployed yet. And as I'm aware of the issue and basically maintaining this DT file, I think that I'll be informed if people try an unlikely arrangement of patches on this board. So either way, I'm okay. But I do think it's not worth thinking too much about this case. Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre
