Francesco Ruggeri <frugg...@arista.com> writes:

> If macvlan_common_newlink fails in register_netdevice after macvlan_init
> then it decrements port->count twice, first in macvlan_uninit (from
> register_netdevice or rollback_registered) and then again in
> macvlan_common_newlink.
> A similar problem may exist in the ipvlan driver.
> This patch consolidates modifications to port->count into macvlan_init
> and macvlan_uninit (thanks to Eric Biederman for suggesting this approach).
> In macvtap_device_event it also avoids cleaning up in NETDEV_UNREGISTER
> if NETDEV_REGISTER had previously failed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Francesco Ruggeri <frugg...@arista.com>

The macvlan_init bits obviously corect.

The macvtap bits I don't really understand what is going on.


> diff --git a/drivers/net/macvtap.c b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
> index 95394ed..e770221 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/macvtap.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
> @@ -1303,6 +1303,8 @@ static int macvtap_device_event(struct notifier_block 
> *unused,
>               }
>               break;
>       case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
> +             if (vlan->minor == 0)
> +                     break;

I don't understand this bit.  A minor of 0 is never assigned.  That is
clear from the code.  On what code path can you get here without
assigning a minor?

My gut says this either needs a big fat comment explaining what is going
on, or a slight refactoring of the code (like moving port count
increments into macvlan_init) that makes it so this code path can't
happen.

>               devt = MKDEV(MAJOR(macvtap_major), vlan->minor);
>               device_destroy(macvtap_class, devt);
>               macvtap_free_minor(vlan);

Eric

Reply via email to