On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 02:00 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > This sounds completely wrong. Do you guys remember the Subject: string > of this discussion by any chance?
Discussed offline at the wireless summit, sorry. > It's very likely that tools do indeed loop when they see EAGAIN, but > this is a workaround, not the main mode of operation. It seems obvious > to me that the get method should wait until the scan results are > available. Perhaps the discussion had a specific scenario where > EAGAIN would make sense, but I cannot imagine what it might be. Right, they do loop, but they don't have a method to indicate completion. Thus we'd have to actually wait for the completion in the kernel. Jean, what is the intended use here? johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
