On 4/18/16, 5:57 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> > Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:35:56 -0700 > >> On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 14:10 -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote: >> >>> + if (filter_mask & IFLA_STATS_FILTER_BIT(IFLA_STATS_LINK_64)) { >>> + struct rtnl_link_stats64 *sp; >>> + >>> + attr = nla_reserve(skb, IFLA_STATS_LINK_64, >>> + sizeof(struct rtnl_link_stats64)); >>> + if (!attr) >>> + goto nla_put_failure; >>> + >>> + sp = nla_data(attr); >> Are you sure we have a guarantee that sp is aligned to u64 fields ? >> >> x86 does not care, but some arches would have a potential misalign >> access here. > I'll do some testing on sparc and deal with any fallout. Thanks David. I will be happy to respin if you see problems.
- Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rtnetlink: add ... Johannes Berg
- Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rtnetlink:... Emmanuel Grumbach
- Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rtnetlink:... David Miller
- Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rtnetl... Johannes Berg
- Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rtnetl... David Ahern
- Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rtnetl... Johannes Berg
- Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rtnetl... Jiri Benc
- Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rtnetl... Johannes Berg
- Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rtnetl... Jiri Benc
- Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rtnetl... Johannes Berg
- Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rtnetlink: add new RTM_... roopa
- Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rtnetlink: add new RTM_GETSTATS ... David Miller
- Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rtnetlink: add new RTM_GETS... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rtnetlink: add new RTM_GETS... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rtnetlink: add new RTM_... David Miller
- Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rtnetlink: add new ... David Miller
- Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rtnetlink: add ... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rtnetlink: add ... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rtnetlink:... Nicolas Dichtel
- Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rtnetl... David Miller
- Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rtnetl... Roopa Prabhu