On 4/6/2016 8:57 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Troy Kisky <troy.ki...@boundarydevices.com> > Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 17:42:47 -0700 > >> Sure, that's an easy change. But if a TX int is what caused the >> interrupt and masks them, and then a RX packet happens before napi >> runs, do you want the TX serviced 1st, or RX ? > > If you properly split your driver up into seperate interrupt/poll > instances, one for TX one for RX, you wouldn't need to ask me > that question now would you? > > :-) >
I absolutely claim no ownership :-)
