Patrick McHardy wrote: > jamal wrote: > >>On Thu, 2006-06-04 at 17:20 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: >> >> >> >>>You must have misunderstood my the first time, the first variant >>>is what I've always proposed. tc_act_common is an abstraction for >>>the _members_ of the hash, the actions. >> >> >>But you are still confusing me Patrick, otherwise i would agree with >>you ;-> >>Are you gonna have this in a separate structure or within tc_act_ops? > > > Probably tc_act_ops, I don't think its worth introducing a new struct > just for these three members.
I think now you confused me :) To be explicit: the hash pointer, the size and the lock will be contained in tc_act_ops. The actions itself (tc_act_common) of course not, that wouldn't make any sense. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
