On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 11:53:25PM +0100, Francois Romieu wrote: > Phil Sutter <p...@nwl.cc> : > [...] > > Your patch submissions are getting better, also good to see you're > > finally using git-send-email. A few things need to be corrected though: > > > > #define BMCR_RESV 0x003f /* Unused... */ > #define BMCR_SPEED1000 0x0040 /* MSB of Speed (1000) */ > #define BMCR_CTST 0x0080 /* Collision test */ > #define BMCR_FULLDPLX 0x0100 /* Full duplex */ > #define BMCR_ANRESTART 0x0200 /* Auto negotiation restart */ > #define BMCR_ISOLATE 0x0400 /* Isolate data paths from MII */ > #define BMCR_PDOWN 0x0800 /* Enable low power state */ > #define BMCR_ANENABLE 0x1000 /* Enable auto negotiation */ > #define BMCR_SPEED100 0x2000 /* Select 100Mbps */ > #define BMCR_LOOPBACK 0x4000 /* TXD loopback bits */ > > BMCR_SPEED100 apart, *all* these bits are now set. > > It does not make much sense.
I presumed that already, but didn't care to check myself so instead ignored the actual code change. Thanks for pointing out the futility of the whole thing. :) > > Also detailed instructions on how to trigger the problem you are fixing > > for would be good. In detail: Which specific hardware was used, in which > > situation did the problem occur, how did it behave in that situation and > > what was the expected behaviour? > > Been there. Such requests are usually left unanswered. :o( That's my impression from following the (somewhat amusing) former threads, too. I was merely impressed by the sheer quality of this patch in comparison to previous ones. Speaking of which, the presented tenacity certainly earns some respect. Cheers, Phil