Hi, On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:10:06PM -0700, Tolga Ceylan wrote: > I apologize for not properly following up on this. I had the > impression that we did not want to merge my original patch and then I > also noticed that it fails to keep the hash consistent. Recently, I > read the follow ups on it as well as Willy's patch/proposals. > > Is there any update on Willy's SO_REUSEPORT patch? IMHO, it solves the > problem and it is simpler than adding new sock option.
no, Craig's changes were merged, and I haven't checked yet if my patch needs to be rebased or still applies. Feel free to check it and resubmit if you have time. Best regards, Willy
