[PATCH] sctp: do not update a_rwnd if we are not issuing a sack

[Marcelo Ricardo Leitner]

The SACK can be lost pretty much elsewhere, but if its allocation fail,
we know we are not sending it, so it is better to revert a_rwnd to its
previous value as this may give it a chance to issue a window update
later.

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leit...@gmail.com>
---
 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
index 
3c22c41a2bc2dc128d651f64b1a81036be22b9b3..7fe56d0acabf66cfd8fe29dfdb45f7620b470ac7
 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
@@ -215,10 +215,14 @@ static int sctp_gen_sack(struct sctp_association *asoc, 
int force,
                sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TIMER_RESTART,
                                SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_SACK));
        } else {
+               __u32 old_a_rwnd = asoc->a_rwnd;
+
                asoc->a_rwnd = asoc->rwnd;
                sack = sctp_make_sack(asoc);
-               if (!sack)
+               if (!sack) {
+                       asoc->a_rwnd = old_a_rwnd;
                        goto nomem;
+               }
 
                asoc->peer.sack_needed = 0;
                asoc->peer.sack_cnt = 0;
-- 
2.5.0