On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 20:21:55 +0300 Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtyl...@cogentembedded.com> wrote:
> > --- a/net/core/skbuff.c > > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c > > @@ -801,9 +801,9 @@ void napi_consume_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, int budget) > > if (unlikely(!skb)) > > return; > > > > - /* if budget is 0 assume netpoll w/ IRQs disabled */ > > + /* Zero budget indicate none-NAPI context called us, like netpoll */ > > Non-NAPI? Okay, I'll send a V4. Hope there are no more nitpicking changes... I'll also adjust the subj none-NAPI -> non-NAPI, and hope that does not disturb patchwork. -- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer