On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 20:21:55 +0300
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtyl...@cogentembedded.com> wrote:

> > --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > @@ -801,9 +801,9 @@ void napi_consume_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, int budget)
> >     if (unlikely(!skb))
> >             return;
> >
> > -   /* if budget is 0 assume netpoll w/ IRQs disabled */
> > +   /* Zero budget indicate none-NAPI context called us, like netpoll */  
> 
>     Non-NAPI?

Okay, I'll send a V4.  Hope there are no more nitpicking changes...
I'll also adjust the subj none-NAPI -> non-NAPI, and hope that does not
disturb patchwork.

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

Reply via email to