On 3/31/06, Ingo Oeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kumar Gala wrote: > > Fair, but wouldn't it be better to have the association per client. > > > > Maybe leave the one as a summary and have a dir per client with > > similar stats that are for each client and add a per channel summary > > at the top level as well. > Such level of detail really belongs to debugging, IMHO. [snip]
If we implemented more stats then yes debugfs sounds like it might be the way to go. > BTW: What is the actual frequency, at which such counters > will be incremented? Currently the code updates these variables (kept per cpu) every time a copy is queued. See include/linux/dmaengine.h. -- Andy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
