On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Amir Vadai <a...@vadai.me> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 09:45:28AM -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
>>
>> So why?
> The struct will not be used, and without exposing it, the compiler will
> complain on code like I have in patch 9/10 ("net/mlx5e: Support offload
> cls_flower with drop action"):
>
> static int parse_tc_actions(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, struct tcf_exts *exts,
> u32 *action, u32 *flow_tag)Why not make this a nop when CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT is not set?
