On 3/2/2016 8:13 AM, Fugang Duan wrote: > From: Troy Kisky <troy.ki...@boundarydevices.com> Sent: Thursday, February > 25, 2016 8:37 AM >> To: netdev@vger.kernel.org; da...@davemloft.net; b38...@freescale.com >> Cc: fabio.este...@freescale.com; l.st...@pengutronix.de; and...@lunn.ch; >> trem...@gmail.com; li...@arm.linux.org.uk; linux-arm- >> ker...@lists.infradead.org; l...@boundarydevices.com; shawn...@kernel.org; >> johan...@sipsolutions.net; stillcompil...@gmail.com; >> sergei.shtyl...@cogentembedded.com; a...@arndb.de; Troy Kisky >> <troy.ki...@boundarydevices.com> >> Subject: [PATCH net-next V2 04/16] net: fec: reduce interrupts >> >> By clearing the NAPI interrupts in the NAPI routine and not in the interrupt >> handler, we can reduce the number of interrupts. We also don't need any >> status variables as the registers are still valid. >> >> Also, notice that if budget pkts are received, the next call to >> fec_enet_rx_napi >> will now continue to receive the previously pending packets. >> >> Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky <troy.ki...@boundarydevices.com> >> --- >> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h | 6 +- >> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c | 127 ++++++++++++---------------- >> -- >> 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h >> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h >> index 195122e..001200b 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h >> @@ -505,11 +505,7 @@ struct fec_enet_private { >> >> unsigned int total_tx_ring_size; >> unsigned int total_rx_ring_size; >> - >> - unsigned long work_tx; >> - unsigned long work_rx; >> - unsigned long work_ts; >> - unsigned long work_mdio; >> + uint events; >> >> struct platform_device *pdev; >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c >> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c >> index c517194..4a218b9 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c >> @@ -70,8 +70,6 @@ static void fec_enet_itr_coal_init(struct net_device >> *ndev); >> >> #define DRIVER_NAME "fec" >> >> -#define FEC_ENET_GET_QUQUE(_x) ((_x == 0) ? 1 : ((_x == 1) ? 2 : 0)) >> - >> /* Pause frame feild and FIFO threshold */ >> #define FEC_ENET_FCE (1 << 5) >> #define FEC_ENET_RSEM_V 0x84 >> @@ -1257,21 +1255,6 @@ static void fec_txq(struct net_device *ndev, struct >> fec_enet_private *fep, >> writel(0, txq->bd.reg_desc_active); >> } >> >> -static void >> -fec_enet_tx(struct net_device *ndev) >> -{ >> - struct fec_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(ndev); >> - struct fec_enet_priv_tx_q *txq; >> - u16 queue_id; >> - /* First process class A queue, then Class B and Best Effort queue */ >> - for_each_set_bit(queue_id, &fep->work_tx, FEC_ENET_MAX_TX_QS) >> { >> - clear_bit(queue_id, &fep->work_tx); >> - txq = fep->tx_queue[FEC_ENET_GET_QUQUE(queue_id)]; >> - fec_txq(ndev, fep, txq); >> - } >> - return; >> -} >> - >> static int >> fec_enet_new_rxbdp(struct net_device *ndev, struct bufdesc *bdp, struct >> sk_buff *skb) { @@ -1504,92 +1487,80 @@ rx_processing_done: >> return pkt_received; >> } >> >> -static int >> -fec_enet_rx(struct net_device *ndev, int budget) -{ >> - int pkt_received = 0; >> - u16 queue_id; >> - struct fec_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(ndev); >> - struct fec_enet_priv_rx_q *rxq; >> - >> - for_each_set_bit(queue_id, &fep->work_rx, FEC_ENET_MAX_RX_QS) >> { >> - clear_bit(queue_id, &fep->work_rx); >> - rxq = fep->rx_queue[FEC_ENET_GET_QUQUE(queue_id)]; >> - pkt_received += fec_rxq(ndev, fep, rxq, budget - >> pkt_received); >> - } >> - return pkt_received; >> -} >> - >> -static bool >> -fec_enet_collect_events(struct fec_enet_private *fep, uint int_events) -{ >> - if (int_events == 0) >> - return false; >> - >> - if (int_events & FEC_ENET_RXF_0) >> - fep->work_rx |= (1 << 2); >> - if (int_events & FEC_ENET_RXF_1) >> - fep->work_rx |= (1 << 0); >> - if (int_events & FEC_ENET_RXF_2) >> - fep->work_rx |= (1 << 1); >> - >> - if (int_events & FEC_ENET_TXF_0) >> - fep->work_tx |= (1 << 2); >> - if (int_events & FEC_ENET_TXF_1) >> - fep->work_tx |= (1 << 0); >> - if (int_events & FEC_ENET_TXF_2) >> - fep->work_tx |= (1 << 1); >> - >> - return true; >> -} >> - >> static irqreturn_t >> fec_enet_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) { >> struct net_device *ndev = dev_id; >> struct fec_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(ndev); >> - uint int_events; >> - irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE; >> + uint eir = readl(fep->hwp + FEC_IEVENT); >> + uint int_events = eir & readl(fep->hwp + FEC_IMASK); >> >> - int_events = readl(fep->hwp + FEC_IEVENT); >> - writel(int_events, fep->hwp + FEC_IEVENT); >> - fec_enet_collect_events(fep, int_events); >> - >> - if ((fep->work_tx || fep->work_rx) && fep->link) { >> - ret = IRQ_HANDLED; >> + if (!int_events) >> + return IRQ_NONE; >> >> + if (int_events & (FEC_ENET_RXF | FEC_ENET_TXF)) { >> if (napi_schedule_prep(&fep->napi)) { >> /* Disable the NAPI interrupts */ >> writel(FEC_NAPI_IMASK, fep->hwp + FEC_IMASK); >> __napi_schedule(&fep->napi); >> + int_events &= ~(FEC_ENET_RXF | FEC_ENET_TXF); >> + if (!int_events) >> + return IRQ_HANDLED; >> + } else { >> + fep->events |= int_events; >> + pr_info("%s: couldn't schedule NAPI\n", __func__); >> } >> } >> >> - if (int_events & FEC_ENET_MII) { >> - ret = IRQ_HANDLED; >> + writel(int_events, fep->hwp + FEC_IEVENT); >> + if (int_events & FEC_ENET_MII) >> complete(&fep->mdio_done); >> - } >> >> - if (fep->ptp_clock) >> + if ((int_events & FEC_ENET_TS_TIMER) && fep->ptp_clock) >> fec_ptp_check_pps_event(fep); >> - > This is error in here. FEC compare timer event is not TS timer. > >
So when should fec_ptp_check_pps_event be called ? On every interrupt ? If napi is active, it is going to be delayed for a very long time. Should it be moved to the napi routine?