On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 12:58:02AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > On Sad, 2006-02-25 at 08:41 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > the regualatory problems are not true. > > They are although the binary interpretation isn't AFAIK from law but > from lawyers. The same is actually true in much of the EU. The actual > requirement is that the transmitting device must be reasonably > tamperproof. Some of the lawyers have decided that for a software radio > tamperproof means "binary".
Exactly. There's no strong requirement, it's just over-zealous corporate lawyers. That's why we need to push Intel strongly here. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
