From: Rick Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:21:30 -0800
> My point (perhaps not as well expressed as the one on the top of my > head :) was that if 2.4 is "OK" with extending the window beyond > 32767 without adding additional semantics on those options, why > should 2.6 need to? 2.4.x has the same window limiting code, if it isn't limiting the window it's either a bug or a local change the person reporting that made. I'm not removing the limit without some kind of sanity check such as the successful negotiation of timestamps. Send me a patch to implement this or drop this discussion. Thanks a lot. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
