In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:05:23 -0500), jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> diff --git a/include/linux/xfrm.h b/include/linux/xfrm.h > index 82fbb75..b54a129 100644 > --- a/include/linux/xfrm.h > +++ b/include/linux/xfrm.h : > @@ -235,6 +258,11 @@ struct xfrm_usersa_id { > __u8 proto; > }; > > +struct xfrm_aevent_id { > + __u32 flags; > + struct xfrm_usersa_id sa_id; > +}; > + > struct xfrm_userspi_info { > struct xfrm_usersa_info info; > __u32 min; : Maybe paranoid, but anyway... Jamal, is this okay on 64/32 biarch, which means, there are no differenes between 32bit arch and 64bit arch? IMHO, because of alignment, it is better to swap flags and sa_id, isn't it? --yoshfuji - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html