On 2/8/06, Roberto Nibali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I've thought about the linux/modules.h header (ignoring the fact
> mentioned by Herbert because of its small chance of happening) and my
> suggestion was/is to move it to ip_vs.h. I'll ping Arnaldo regarding
> this cleanup, since he's done it before and certainly has some scripts
> to automate this.

Well, I use a graphviz based tool to see the "picture", i.e. the
header hierarchy,
like this one:

http://oops.ghostprotocols.net:81/acme/tcp.h.ps

The tools are called hviz and ghviz and are available at:

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/acme/

I've been thinking about using sparse to do a include "linker", i.e. a tool
that would find all the symbols "provided" by .h files and the symbols
"required" by .h and .c files, that would tell what headers are needed
and what headers currently being #included aren't needed and should
be dropped, but have other priorities in my TODO list right now :-\

- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to