David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think we should revert that thing, it's caused more grief than > anything else. I thought it was a complete waste of time from the > get-go even assuming that fraglists within fraglists never occur...
I share your feelings towards this patch. However, what e1000 is doing is broken. It should be filling in the frags array, not frag_list. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
