On Tue, 2006-31-01 at 01:16 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: > David S. Miller wrote: > > From: dean gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:22:40 -0800 (PST) > > > > > >>let me know what you think... i'd like to get something like this patch > >>included upstream so i can eliminate a patch from several of my kernels. > > > > > > The RTA length check is a little hackish. Maybe use a new > > attribute? That's usually the way to extend netlink things. > > > > I have no opinion about this feature, can others comment > > please? > > I think this should be done the way ESFQ does it by adding seperate hash > functions.
yes that would be a lot cleaner than the posted patch. Actually even better is to pass exactly what should be used for hashing (else you use the current defined hash). cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
