On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:55:10 -0800 (PST) "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 21:42:38 +0100 > > > On Tuesday 17 January 2006 21:31, jamal wrote: > > > > > the TIPC tree has been open for months now for review. > > > > That is not how Linux code review works - the code is supposed to get posted > > to the appropiate mailing lists so that people can go over it. > > Reviewers normally don't hunt for random websites to look at code there. > > I agree with Andi, TIPC should have been submitted as a set of > patches or a pointer to such, on netdev before going in. > > I take the blame for this, as I didn't enforce this procedure for the > TIPC folks and I definitely should have. > > So let's clean it up and I'll be more mindful to not sidestep this in > the future. > > Andi, thanks for calling a spade a spade. It definitely was in this > case. TIPC went through the back door and that's totally > unacceptable. Also, let's work with the current code. It is a lot easier to let others clean it up, if the changes are against the mainline (or -mm) rather than having to send it off to get put into yet another git repo. -- Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OSDL http://developer.osdl.org/~shemminger - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
