On Friday 13 January 2006 14:18, you wrote: > On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 14:15 +0100, Thomas Graf wrote: > > > I'll only comment on the netlink bits and leave the rest to > > others. I'd highly recommend the use of attributes instead > > of fixed message structures to allow the interface to be > > flexible to extensions while staying binary compatible. > > I think something like that will have to be done anyway to support > changing multiple items at once. > > But IMHO this is all still a bit premature -- we need to figure out > first how to handle configuration that needs to be shared between > virtual devices and not.
Sure, it is clearly throw-away code. I just wanted to play around a bit how this could look like and to get some initial comments on the whole stuff. The comments were all very useful. Sure, the stuff has to be rewritten. ;) -- Greetings Michael.
pgpVK9oSQ2J6P.pgp
Description: PGP signature
