On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 18:20 +0100, Jiri Benc wrote: > Sure, it is way more better. But again, it's the question of > compatibility. I think that at least for some time the new netlink API > and WE should coexist. After some time, WE support can be removed.
Wouldn't it make more sense to put compatibility one layer up by introducing a new helper command 'iwconfig' that has the same user-level syntax but calls the netlink api instead? johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
