On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, jamal wrote:
On Mon, 2005-19-12 at 13:57 -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
From: jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:17:19 -0500
Just an addendum: If this works it should be sysctl controlled i hope.
There is absolutely no reason for that, so no :)
Well, we went from "use old SA" to "use new SA" policy;->
No, we went from "use both new and old SA" to "always use the same (new)
SA". Adding a sysctl for keeping kernel buggy is totally wrong.
best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
