Hi! > > Please stop beeing a freaking jackass. There are various projects using > > the current code. It's not perfect but people are working on it. > > Yes, and everyone implements his own softmac (this is the third one I > know about). I tried to put all of these efforts together (google > through the netdev archives) and wrote many patches.
Well, unfortunately people seem to disagree about "what the right softmac is". And James's code is in kernel, thats _huge_ advantage. > > And please stop your stupid devicespace advertisements. If you think the > > code is so useful why don't you send patches to integrate it with the > > currently existing wireless code (after cleaning up the horrible mess > > it is currently)? > > This is what I'm doing last two months. But it's not so easy to clean it > up and it seems that nobody else is interested. But it has all of the > features you need (except active scanning) - this is the reason I > stopped to work on improving current in-kernel 802.11 code and focused > on Devicescape's code. It is several years beyond the state that current > code is at now. And it is not an advertisement, it is a fact. Another fact is that it is not in kernel, and by the time you get it cleaned up, in-kernel code will probably get advanced enough that your code will not be merged. If devicescape is really so much better, submit it _now_. It may be slightly buggy, but so is probably current code. -- Thanks, Sharp! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
